The readiness map · edition 1.1 · as of Oct 26, 2026
Is AI ready for your science yet?
Eight fields, seven kinds of work. Each cell says whether AI is routine, works with care, is still research, or is not there yet, and links the sources that put it there. The four states follow NASA's Technology Readiness Levels.
- Four jobs are routine today: predicting a single protein's structure, 1 to 15 day weather forecasts, picking earthquake arrivals, and screening mammograms.
- Analysis is where AI is most ready. In 7 of 8 fields, analyzing data and images is routine or works with care.
- Generating hypotheses is still research in every field. AI suggests ideas, but no field has independent proof that they hold up.
- Self-driving labs are not routine anywhere yet. The closed loop works in demos, not yet in everyday lab work.
- Routine. Independently validated, in production at several organizations, with a tool you can use today.
- Works with care. Validated and usable, but it needs expert checking or only works for part of the field.
- Research only. Shown in papers or by the developer, not yet replicated at scale or not available to use.
- Not yet. No credible demonstration, or claims that failed when others checked.
| Field | Literature | Hypotheses | Predict | Design | Analyze | Simulate | Experiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proteins | |||||||
| Genomics and cells | |||||||
| Drug discovery | |||||||
| Chemistry and materials | |||||||
| Neuroscience | |||||||
| Medicine and imaging | |||||||
| Earth and climate | |||||||
| Physics, astro, math |
How this map is made
The bar for each state
- Routine. Independently validated, in production at several organizations, with a tool you can use today.
- Works with care. Validated and usable, but it needs expert checking or only works for part of the field.
- Research only. Shown in papers or by the developer, not yet replicated at scale or not available to use.
- Not yet. No credible demonstration, or claims that failed when others checked.
The four states follow NASA's Technology Readiness Levels, the scale engineers use to judge whether a technology is ready to fly.
How a cell gets its rating
- Each cell names one concrete task, so the rating is about a real job, not a whole field. Inside it, three or four smaller tasks get their own ratings, because one job can be routine in one part and still research in another.
- Each cell cites 7 to 13 sources. Every source is tagged by kind, by whether it backs or cuts against the rating, and by whether it comes from the tool's maker.
- Every source was opened and read before it went in. Where only a summary could be read, the cell notes it. For Routine and Works with care, at least one comes from someone other than the tool's maker.
- Claude, Anthropic's AI model, helped me find and compile the sources. Where a source comes from Anthropic itself, the cell says so.
- Independent tests, trials, regulator decisions and failure reports count for more than launch posts.
- When the evidence is mixed, the cell takes the lower state and says why. Ratings can move down as well as up.
Magennis, E. (2026). AI for Science readiness map, edition 1.1. erinmagennis.com/aiforscience/readiness
Every cell is dated and sourced, and the field moves fast. Want this mapped for your own lab's work? That is the audit I do.